<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>stablevalue.com: GE</title>
    <link>http://www.stablevalue.com/articles/2003/10/10/ge</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>a blog on stock market and things of interest</description>
    <item>
      <title>GE</title>
      <description>Closed GE at loss. GE lowered projection for the Q4, which probably explained in hindsight why it didn't move up much once it hit 31 (obviously people with inside information were unloading at 31 level therefore the resistence could not be broken) and original target of 32 was DOA. Using a scale in/out strategy would probably work better since we would book partial profits at 31 level.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:54:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:5eb166e7e3ab79762d2317aa56e66f69</guid>
      <author>btr</author>
      <link>http://www.stablevalue.com/articles/2003/10/10/ge</link>
      <category>Futures</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

